Title: Dracula.
Writer(s): Bram Stocker.
Publisher: Canterbury Classics.
Format: Flexibound.
Release Date: September 1st, 2011.
Original Release Date: May 26th, 1897.
Pages: 368.
Genre(s): Classics, Horror, Fantasy.
ISBN13: 9781607105510.
My Overall Rating:

As if sleep isn’t already a difficult task for many, there’s nothing like the knowledge of an unknown and mysterious undead roaming the night to replenish itself on your blood to keep, just about anyone, up, wide awake and cowering in fear. Serving as the ultimate and definitive form of a vampire, Count Dracula is one of the most dominant mythologized creatures that has been used and reused across countless various mediums, effortlessly allowing his reputation to precede him as any character confronted with his presence has them running amok in search of garlic and objects to form crosses. Despite numerous adaptations of the character plaguing the world, Bram Stocker’s novel, published in 1897, remains a quintessential piece of horror now indubitably tagged as a must-read classic.
What is Dracula about? The story begins with newly-appointed real estate agent Jonathan Harker who visits Count Dracula at his castle in the Carpathian Mountains, with the latter hoping to find and purchase a new home near London. Despite being told to remain in his chambers during the night, Jonathan Harker’s foray into the castle leads to an inadvertent discovery, pitting him up against terrifying beings, miserably vulnerable and at their mercy. What follows is an adventure surrounding a motley of peculiar characters experiencing and witnessing odd things until they join forces with Professor Abraham Van Helsing who ultimately sends them on the hunt of a lifetime.
“There are darknesses in life and there are lights, and you are one of the lights, the light of all lights.”
— Bram Stocker
Written in an epistolary form, with letters, newspaper clippings, diary entries, and ships’ logs, the story immediately establishes a realistic tone whilst sacrificing story-telling pacing, thus making the few action-packed moments bring incredible relief and hope to the reader, hope that there’s so much more to this than a tale of fear of the unknown, friendships, and romance. The variety in viewpoints, not limited to Jonathan Harker, as one would expect going into this novel, also dilutes the story’s focus, with numerous instances of pure mundanity or repetitious prattle barely adding anything worthwhile to the core narrative. Despite the nature of said descriptions offering very little substance for the reader’s own journey to discovering Dracula’s domain, these lush writing exercises undeniably highlight the author’s beautiful way with words, making the reading endeavour far less boresome than it actually is.
Surprisingly enough, there are very few moments throughout the book that actually contains Count Dracula. This realization halfway into the book made me slog through many letters, especially those that served the only purpose of creating a gloomy and gothic atmosphere in the story. The lack of urgency throughout most of the narrative also forbids any form of connection with the characters and their plight. It was only when things got intense (e.g. actual violence and evil in the air) that the story got intriguing but the little of that made for a rough read in the end. Nonetheless, it is difficult not to encourage curious minds to pick up this classic piece of literature if not only to discover the mythology at the heart of vampire lore.
Dracula is an elegantly written mythologization of vampires, however, oddly paced, and weighed down by its superficial yet atmospheric descriptions.



The spirit of Dracula has come to haunt the world today in many forms. The mythological, demonic personality of Dracula is worth being analyzed many times over.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It sure can! I’ve heard some people even devise some interesting sexual and racial theories around Dracula’s tale too.
LikeLike
I agree with your views on this one, Lashaan. It is a classic tale and worthy of a read, but it sometimes for me was more flash and less substance. Kind of more concerned with world-building than anything else. I’m a fan of all things Dracula. Enjoyed this read!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly, Bruce. I went into this tale with flagrantly different expectations (my fault though, I know) but I still appreciate the reading experience and now better understand Bram Stocker’s incredible contribution to vampire lore. Thanks for reading, sir!
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure, sir. Have a great start to your week!
LikeLiked by 1 person
To you too, sir!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, Count Dracula is probably one of the most mytholized characters, with more movies, books, costumes etc portraying vampires. I read this back in high school, so 20 years or so, and I really don’t remember it much. Wonderful review, Lashaan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find it amazing how this was one of the classics often part of many people’s curriculum. I can totally see why. Thanks for reading, Carla! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, this edition has great cover!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is, isn’t it? I like what they did with a couple of classics for this publisher’s reprints!
LikeLiked by 1 person
No matter how much of a classic this is, the great changes in readers’ tastes and expectations certainly don’t help in connecting with the story or the characters. Still, it’s a *classic* after all… 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly. I still very much appreciate the adventure and better understand why there’s praise around Bram Stocker’s work but I can’t say it’s my favourite monster classic either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can remember on my first re-read of this realizing how slooooow it was. Of course, on my next re-read I made the connection that has as much to do with the times it was written in as with the authors style.
But now you have it under your belt and are good to good for decades and decades 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, I’m glad to have read it but I’ll probably wait a good decade before wanting to dive back into again and better appreciate the context in which it was written. I’ll probably also be more aware of what to expect too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fab review Lashaan!I tried this on audio years again and gave up on it because I found it really boring! 😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t blame you, Nicki! Thanks for reading. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dracula is one of my favourite horror stories and I’ve read this book many times. I remember my first read of it though and it is a strange book to get into as it’s rather oddly structured. That said it’s still a cracking good story and really atmospheric. I like the cover of this edition of the book you have.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m a bit ashamed that it took this long before finally reading it but I’m glad I did. There’s indeed so much to appreciate and I feel like it’s one of those classics that gets better upon rereads, especially once I control my expectations ha! There are a couple of other classics that also got this kind of cover treatment from the publisher, if you’re ever intrigued to get them! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dracula is certainly one of those classics that get even better the more times you read it. I think the book Frankenstein is a bit like that as well. Thanks for letting me know about those covers, I’ll have to look out for those.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, this is one of those books that grows in the imagination, but that actual experience of reading it is a drag.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tell me about it. I’m glad I did though. I have a better understanding of the character and even the famous vampire hunter’s story.
LikeLike
An absolute classic! It’s a little longer than it should have been, but blame it on the era. You’re right, Dracula himself is not much in it but he is the book title! I even studied this book at university.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So cool that you got to study it at University. There’s probably so much to dissect too. And yes, I agree. A bit longer than necessary!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry to hear this one didn’t resonate with you. It’s actually one of my favorite horror stories. I don’t recall how old I was when I first read it, but it’s stuck with me ever since. I’ve actually been thinking about another reread before too much longer, though I’m considering doing it in audiobook format this time around. As I kid, before reading the book, I recall absolutely loving all the movies, as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m still quite glad to have read it but I can’t say I’m compelled to want to go through it again for a while. However, something tells me that I’ll probably appreciate this and even Frankenstein more upon a reread in the future. I do look forward to trying the 1992 movie adaptation in particular though and then some of the much older adaptations.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t mind reading mythological aspect but I have seen many readers saying Dracula isn’t there for most of the story which is quite disappointing. Guess I wouldn’t buy this classic, will just get library book. Great review, Lashaan!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a bit sad that Dracula isn’t much around but there’s still plenty to learn about who is and how he “works” through this classic book. Thanks for reading, Yesha! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dracula was inspired by a ruler called Vlad the Impaler. The Netflix series Rise of the Ottomans gives an accurate portrayal of Vlad the Impaler. Anyway I should write about Dracula as it is the thing that attracts the most about Romania
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve also been quite intrigued by Vlad the Impaler ever since I’ve heard of it. I’ll have to look into that show. Thanks for putting it on my radar.
LikeLike
It can definitely be slow and odd, but for some reason, it’s a book I love. I’ve read it a few times, but it’s been awhile since I’ve done a reread. Not sure if I’d feel the same way now or not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel like I’d appreciate it even more upon a reread. I think my expectations played a lot in how much I enjoyed it this time around.
LikeLiked by 1 person
After my first time reading this book I made it better in my head… so when I made Dave reread it with me I realized what a drag it actually is. Still, I love elements of it and am very happy I read it. My only major problem with it is how anticlimactic the ending is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree! The pacing is off and the ending is ultra anticlimatic hahaha I too am quite happy that I read it though and enjoyed a lot some segments of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I loved reading Dracula in high school. I’m re-reading the book now and it’s a struggle for me because of all the letters, but I feel like I have to have more energy to read the book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel like I’d appreciate this more upon a reread in a couple of years because expectations played a lot in how much I enjoyed it this first time. Hope you enjoy the last bit you got left to read it now! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review Lashaan! While I love books with different points of view and mixing a lot of different genres, it seems like this one only just sets the ambience and that’s just about it – though as I usually like books were nothing really happens maybe I will like this one ahah – Also, it’s in theme with the “One country a month” thing as, if I’m not mistaken, the Carpathian mountains and transylvania (the region where Dracula’s castle supposedly is) are closely linked to Hungary!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Juliette! It’s very much a hate-or-love kind of classic. There’s still plenty to appreciate, as long as you don’t dive into it with too many expectations. And yes! I thought the same but then convinced myself that it fits better with Romania hahah I did get around to reading and finishing my book for the Hungary month though, so no loss there! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
While Dracula is a very influential book, with the character Dracula being the most adapted character in fiction – even more than Sherlock Holmes, there’s no denying that this book was written in a very different time. It’s a fascinating book, but its slow building nature definitely isn’t for everyone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, it’s such a love-or-hate kind of deal but I’m glad I got around to it. I can now better understand its influence on other novels or even on vampires in general!
LikeLike
I am not sure, I want to read this book just to learn more about the background for vampires in the literature. Surely, a story like that ought to be a page turner? I did enjoy Carmilla, but that one was very short.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It really depends on what kind of expectations you have going in, honestly. I had similar side-effects from reading Frankenstein a couple of years ago. I’m convinced my experience of both would be more positive knowing what to expect now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Frankenstein wasn’t at all what I expected either, but I did end up enjoying it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that it gets interesting only when things got intense. It’s a struggle read, to keep one’s interest in it. I think that’s why I’ve been struggling to complete it for years now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s rough! I had completely different expectations for it and that really backfired. I’m just glad I’m done with for a couple of years now hahahah
LikeLike
There’s an interesting aside regarding Stoker’s forays into the London libraries. He actually left margin notes in various books there.
Another one is that about the same time as his writing and release of Dracula, the rise and investigation into the source of rabies was occurring. If you examine rabies and its symptoms and transmission you can’t help but see the similarities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is indeed interesting. It’s nice to know when an author does research for their work and manages to cleverly integrate it into their stories. Thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 1 person